One is racist hatemongering. End of Discussion.
One is patriotic dissension and an exercise of constitutionally protected free speech.
Really?
Can anyone out there provide a rational justification for this double standard? Disagreeing with a set of ideas based upon the substance of those ideas is not a function of the skin color of the mouthpiece for those ideas. Pulling out the race card every time one is challenged cheapens that defense, and will render it meaningless when it is truly deserved.
Anyone recall the Little Boy Who Cried Wolf?
No comments:
Post a Comment